spam

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2009/1/27 Jean Delvare <khali at linux-fr.org>:
> Hi Axel,
>
> On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 19:34:20 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 03:15:33PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
>> > I have already asked our administrator (Axel, Cc'd) to erase this
>> > offending spam from our mailing list archive. And now, Axel, please
>> > _also_ remove this post from Line, as she quoted the message in its
>> > entirety :(
>>
>> Actually the spam was recogniyed at level 3.0, but the filters deny at
>> 5.0 and above. Maybe we should lower the spam barrier (which would hit
>> a couple of false positives, but better to get an email a month denied
>> than be spammed that way).
>
> Thanks for deleting the offending message. There's one more to delete
> here:
> http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2009-January/025201.html
>
> I've blacklisted that specific sender so hopefully we will no longer be
> harmed by similar message... as long as the sender doesn't change.
>
> I am OK with lowering the spam barrier as long as the messages in
> question are either rejected or held for moderation, but not discarded.
>
> --
> Jean Delvare

I share this opinion.

JM




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Hardware Monitoring]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux