Rudolf Marek <rudolf.marek <at> sysgo.com> writes: > > Bernhard Seibold wrote: > > On Di, 2007-09-04 at 20:53 +0200, Rudolf Marek wrote: > >> Are you sure those are correct? The datasheets suggest that you need first > >> extract the 0.25 degC from two lowest bits and THEN subtract 49. > >> > >> Your code does it first. Your method will work only if AMD made a mistake in > >> documentation. Are you sure? > > > > You're right, it should be (raw * 250) - 49000, as M. G. Berberich also > > pointed out to me. > > > > This means the original formula should have worked, so either the > > documentation is wrong, or the sensors are broken (as someone at the AMD > > forums claims). > > Yes it is broken, some Errata suggests this :/ > I just installed the patch on my BE-2350 system and the results seem reasonable. Does this mean that the hardware sensor itself is broken and that the results are reasonable by chance? Juergen
