Bernhard Seibold wrote: > On Di, 2007-09-04 at 20:53 +0200, Rudolf Marek wrote: >> Are you sure those are correct? The datasheets suggest that you need first >> extract the 0.25 degC from two lowest bits and THEN subtract 49. >> >> Your code does it first. Your method will work only if AMD made a mistake in >> documentation. Are you sure? > > You're right, it should be (raw * 250) - 49000, as M. G. Berberich also > pointed out to me. > > This means the original formula should have worked, so either the > documentation is wrong, or the sensors are broken (as someone at the AMD > forums claims). Yes it is broken, some Errata suggests this :/ Rudolf
