Hi! On Mo, 2007-09-03 at 12:36 +0200, Rudolf Marek wrote: > Sooo... the 49 needs to be substracted even from the LSB bits! Does it > really work then ;) ? If so then cool, Seems to works on my Brisbane BE-2350, the reported temperatures look reasonable. > For the CPUID range of revF I would suggest to check the > http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/white_papers_and_tech_docs/33610.pdf > > Page 7, I think you may use > operator in IF to check if CPUID is bigger > or equal than first CPUID of the revF series. Thanks, that's what I was looking for. I revised my patch to use the CPUID model to determine the CPU revision. The patch now uses a function pointer for the selected conversion formula. Not sure if you'll like it, but to me it looks better than using "if" and a macro. Regards, Bernhard -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: k8temp_brisbane_support.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 2063 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/attachments/20070903/4922da4d/attachment.bin
