On 3/22/07, Jean Delvare <khali at linux-fr.org> wrote: > On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 12:45:11 -0700, Juerg Haefliger wrote: > > > That and possibly fixing other mistakes I made. You wrote the dme1737 > > > driver, so I assume you have (or have access to) a DME1737 device or > > > compatible for testing, while I don't. > > > > Ok. Can I roll libsensor/sensors support for the dme1737 into the same > > patch or do I need to hold off until the driver is accepted? > > I'm fine with a single patch for both, yes. OK, started looking at it and noticed 2 things: 1) The ITE superio enter sequence also works for the SMSC, so sensor-detects reports both an (unknown) ITE and a dme1737 SMSC chip. I guess there's nothing we can do about this, can we? 2) Even though the datasheet shows a device ID of 0x78 which matches the sensor-detect output of the ticket reporter, my DME1737 returns 0x77. Should I just add another entry for a DME1737 with dev id 0x77? ...juerg > > -- > Jean Delvare >
