looking at sensors-detect:
> # $_[0]: A reference to the file descriptor to access this chip.
> # $_[1]: Address
> # Returns: undef if not detected, 5 or 6 if detected.
> # Registers used:
> # 0x3E: Manufacturer ID
> # 0x3F: Version/Stepping
> # 0x40: Configuration (2 reserved bits)
> # 0x42: Interrupt Status 2 (1 reserved bit)
> # 0x43: VID (2 reserved bits)
> sub dme1737_detect
> {
> my ($file, $addr) = @_;
> return unless i2c_smbus_read_byte_data($file, 0x3E) == 0x55
this should be 0x5c not 0x55.
> and (i2c_smbus_read_byte_data($file, 0x3F) & 0xF8) == 0x88
> and (i2c_smbus_read_byte_data($file, 0x40) & 0xC4) == 0x04
> and (i2c_smbus_read_byte_data($file, 0x42) & 0x02) == 0x00
> and (i2c_smbus_read_byte_data($file, 0x43) & 0xC0) == 0x00;
Are the checks of addresses 0x40, 0x42 & 0x43 really necessary?
> return ($addr == 0x2e ? 6 : 5);
}
...juerg
On 3/22/07, Juerg Haefliger <juergh at gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, the chip is a DME1737.
> 0x3e: 0x5c == SMSC
> 0x3f: 0x8a == DME1737
>
>
> Jean: I tried to add the comment to the ticket but get a
> 'TICKET_APPEND privileges are required to perform this operation'
> error. I logged in as user 'ticket'.
>
> ...juerg
>
>
> On 3/21/07, lm-sensors <lm-sensors-notify at lm-sensors.org> wrote:
> > #2195: Fails to detect ITE family chip with ID 0x7803
> > ---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
> > Reporter: cc at cs.aau.dk | Owner: khali
> > Type: enhancement | Status: assigned
> > Priority: minor | Milestone:
> > Component: hardware | Version: SVN
> > Resolution: | Keywords:
> > ---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
> > Changes (by khali):
> >
> > * cc: juergh at gmail.com (added)
> >
> > Comment:
> >
> > Juerg, please check this sensors-detect output. The Super-I/O detection
> > finds a DME1737 chip, but the Intel 82801 SMBus probing fails to identify
> > the device at 0x2e as a DME1737.
> >
> > Reporter, can you please provide the output of:
> > {{{
> > i2cdump 0 0x2e
> > }}}
> >
> > --
> > Ticket URL: <http://lm-sensors.org/ticket/2195#comment:2>
> > lm-sensors <http://lm-sensors.org/>
> > Linux hardware monitoring
>
