Hi Marcelo, On 2005-07-11, Marcelo Feitoza Parisi wrote: > I used only time_after() macro, but I was looking better to my patches > and I've found that maybe it would introduce bugs. I was thinking if it > is necessary to use time_after and time_before together, or something > like time_between. No, your three patches are correct. Unfortunately they will not apply as-is due to the driver files being moved to a different place in the source tree, but I'll take care about that. Thanks for these cleanup patches, this is much appreciated. -- Jean Delvare
