Hi there, I did not signed the list. Actually I am developing some patches do kernel-janitors, and I run into a doubt. I used only time_after() macro, but I was looking better to my patches and I've found that maybe it would introduce bugs. I was thinking if it is necessary to use time_after and time_before together, or something like time_between. Thank You -- Marcelo Feitoza Parisi marcelo at feitoza.com.br http://marcelo.feitoza.com.br/ Key ID: 0x42A42C9A / Signed on: 25-04-2005 18:59 Key fingerprint: ADDE EEE7 57D9 FB45 2605 5A03 54DA 3079 42A4 2C9A Key: http://marcelo.feitoza.com.br/GnuPG/chave_publica.asc -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: atxp1.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 762 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/attachments/20050711/384b0dc4/attachment.bin -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: fscpos.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 662 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/attachments/20050711/384b0dc4/attachment-0001.bin -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: gl520sm.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 710 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/attachments/20050711/384b0dc4/attachment-0002.bin
