question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I think the chips are even pin compatible which means that Tyan could 
concievably switch from vendor to vendor for each lot of boards.

Reading the lm85 docs, I see that there are a couple of documented 
"enchancements" in the ADT7463 over the LM85, so it's probably a better 
chip anyway.

:v)

Jean Delvare wrote:

>Hi Paul,
>
>  
>
>>One question I have is that I have two indentical systems from the
>>same  manufacturer, Tyan. One has a Celeron CPU and the other has a P4
>>with HT,  but the motherboards are the same. On one unit I must use a
>>lm85-* in  sensors.conf and the the other with a adt7463-* for the
>>chips section or the  values don't make sense.
>>
>>Could the different CPU's be causing lmsensors to get confused? I even
>>ran  the detect routines and came with the same results. What else
>>could I do to  check this?
>>    
>>
>
>There's nothing wrong with that. Both chips are mostly compatible, so
>Tyan may simply have switched at some point in time for some reason
>(price or availabilty for example). You can notice that both chips are
>supported by the same driver (lm85).
>
>You can share a section of sensors.conf among several chips by simply
>giving it more than just one chip name. If you take a look at the
>default configuration file, that's exactly what we do for the lm85
>driver:
>
>chip "lm85c-*" "adm1027-*" "adt7463-*" "lm85-*" "lm85b-*"
>
>   set temp1_max 50
>
>(...)
>
>Just do that for your own file and you will have a single file to
>maintain for both boards.
>
>  
>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Hardware Monitoring]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux