yes, the detection is done on the secondary super io. So, patch pc87360.c, recompile and try again correct? Thanks so much!! paul ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jean Delvare" <khali at linux-fr.org> To: "Paul Aviles" <paul.aviles at palei.com> Cc: <sensors at Stimpy.netroedge.com> Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 5:43 AM Subject: Re: gs10 > Hi Paul, > >> If I do a modprobe pc87360 it returns >> >> /lib/modules/2.4.22-1.2115.nptl/kernel/drivers/i2c/chips/pc87360.o: >> init_module: No such device >> Hint: insmod errors can be caused by incorrect module parameters, >> including >> invalid IO or IRQ parameters. >> You may find more information in syslog or the output from dmesg >> /lib/modules/2.4.22-1.2115.nptl/kernel/drivers/i2c/chips/pc87360.o: >> insmod /lib/modules/2.4.22-1.2115.nptl/kernel/drivers/i2c/chips/pc87360.o >> failed >> /lib/modules/2.4.22-1.2115.nptl/kernel/drivers/i2c/chips/pc87360.o: >> insmod >> pc87360 failed >> >> (...) >> >> Driver `pc87360' (should be inserted): >> Detects correctly: >> * ISA bus address 0x0820 (Busdriver `i2c-isa') >> Chip `Nat. Semi. PC87366 Super IO Fan Sensors' (confidence: 9) >> * ISA bus address 0x0830 (Busdriver `i2c-isa') >> Chip `Nat. Semi. PC87366 Super IO Voltage Sensors' (confidence: 9) >> * ISA bus address 0x0860 (Busdriver `i2c-isa') >> Chip `Nat. Semi. PC87366 Super IO Thermal Sensors' (confidence: 9) > > I suspect that the PC87366 chip is located on the secondary Super-I/O > address. > The sensors-detect script supports that, but the pc87366 driver doesn't > (yet). > You can check the output of sensors-detect for confirmation, as both > Super-I/O > addresses are checked sequentially. > > Untested patch to pc87360.c attached, may or may not work. Let me know ;) > > Thanks, > > -- > Jean Delvare > http://khali.linux-fr.org/ > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
