On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 11:35:08AM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > > AFAICT these patches need to be simultaneously applied to kernel > > and lm_sensors (which will make their inclusion in 2.8.7 more > > difficult...) > > I don't see why it would be more difficult. Remember that the fact that > I sent you three different patches is not relevant. The lm_sensors > dmi_scan patch will be integrated to our source tree, so you won't have > to care about it. Ditto for the mkpatch change. And the kernel patch > will be integrated into mkpatch, so you won't have to apply it > manually. This means that you won't have to take any different action. > You will just use mkpatch to generate the patch, and apply it to the > kernel tree. > > Remember that the issue doesn't affect the compilation outside of the > kernel tree. Ah, OK, that was the part I was missing. I thought the patch to the kernel's dmi_scan would be neccessary in the case of external compilation also. > So it looks quite easy and straightforward, providing I update the > lm_sensors files as planned. Or did I miss a thing? No, I did ;) -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/attachments/20040407/790a336a/attachment.bin
