On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 11:10:25AM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > > > The recent change seems to have removed some behaviour that seems - > > > by comments - to be required for kernel 2.4. > What is the problem exactly? Considering that 1* you most likely don't > have a PCF8591 and 2* the "missing" line has no effect by default, I > just don't get what you are worrying about. Thanks for clarifying, I believe the original poster (bishop <bishop at platypus.bc.ca>) was doing only code reviewing, so nothing to really worry about. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/attachments/20040407/af472ca1/attachment.bin
