I think i2c-proc is fixed. Please test. I've added several updates to the home page and the download page in the last few days. On the download page we already have a warning in bold that CVS is under "active development" which is intended as a warning. On your issue with matroxfb_maven unresolved symbols, we unfortunately are no longer compatible with i2c modules in stock 2.4 kernels, due to struct changes adding owner and removing inc_use and dec_use. You definitely don't want i2c drivers from a 2.4 kernel compiled-in or loaded as modules Let's discuss what to do about this - some possiblilities: We can back out the struct changes... We can add big warnings to the release and work on submitting a 2.4 patch.... We can try and require a very recent 2.4 kernel... We can include a patch to a recent 2.4 kernel to convert all i2c drivers... We can include some compatibility code... Would anybody like to work on a patch for 2.4 for submission to Marcelo? Jean Delvare wrote: >>BTW when you rmmod i2c-proc right now, it doesn't completely remove >>the sysctl table, and things really go bad. >>I'm doing lots of diffs to figure out what to do next and hope to get >>things into shape tomorrow. mds > > > OK, thanks. Let me know if I can help (though I really have no knowledge > about I2C and such). > > Maybe adding a news item saying I2C is known to be somewhat broken could > be welcome? The latest related new item was added in March, readers > could believe the situation has changed since. >
