Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 08:50:16PM -0500, Mark D. Studebaker wrote: > >> >>Greg KH wrote: >> >>>On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 08:25:48PM -0500, Mark D. Studebaker wrote: >>> >> >>>>If he's done and things start coming through us again, >>>>then it makes sense to sync up with 2.5.65. >>> >>> >>>Even without Christoph's changes, you need to keep up with the kernel >>>tree in order to keep in sync with the most recent development. As I >>>previously mentioned, this is tough to do, but once everything gets into >>>the main kernel tree, the work is much smaller. >>> >> >>I understand. Nobody's volunteered to do it. > > > Well, I'm offering to be a go-between if you want me to do it. > Fine w/ me. The others on the list are being conspicuously silent. Is this work (and driver priorities) being driven by IBM or is this on your own time? > >>>Oh, and who is the maintainer of the kernel i2c code? The listed people >>>in the MAINTAINERS file don't seem to be around anymore (and one of the >>>emails listed there is currently invalid.) >>> >> >>That's us. We talked about submitting a patch to MAINTAINERS to make >>it official but we haven't. > > > I'd really recommend it. Please send me a patch to that file for my > next round of stuff I send off to Linus. > OK. Can we just put in the mailing list name or should we put in people's names? > thanks, > > greg k-h >
