On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 08:50:16PM -0500, Mark D. Studebaker wrote: > > > Greg KH wrote: > >On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 08:25:48PM -0500, Mark D. Studebaker wrote: > > > > >>If he's done and things start coming through us again, > >>then it makes sense to sync up with 2.5.65. > > > > > >Even without Christoph's changes, you need to keep up with the kernel > >tree in order to keep in sync with the most recent development. As I > >previously mentioned, this is tough to do, but once everything gets into > >the main kernel tree, the work is much smaller. > > > > I understand. Nobody's volunteered to do it. Well, I'm offering to be a go-between if you want me to do it. > >Oh, and who is the maintainer of the kernel i2c code? The listed people > >in the MAINTAINERS file don't seem to be around anymore (and one of the > >emails listed there is currently invalid.) > > > > That's us. We talked about submitting a patch to MAINTAINERS to make > it official but we haven't. I'd really recommend it. Please send me a patch to that file for my next round of stuff I send off to Linus. thanks, greg k-h
