On Sun, 12 Jan 2003, Mark Studebaker wrote: > We have a vote from Ky?sti for branching. > Albert suggested the same thing to me in an email. > Pavel suggested abandoning CVS and doing everything in Linus' tree. > > I'm really reluctant to branch but it may be the only realistic way to do it > unless somebody volunteers to do patches manually (and perpetually) For 2.5 branch in CVS, I would use tags like lk2-5-53 to match it with Linus's releases. And not bother with any KERNEL_VERSION there, if one wants 2.5 she/he, will use the latest anyway. > I guess we would do the 2.4 cleanup on the sensors side, > then release 2.8.0, then branch? Tag CVS before cleanup commit, I used LATEST-PRE-2.4.9-KERNEL for i2c. -- Ky?sti M?lkki kmalkki at cc.hut.fi
