On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 09:00:19AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 02:20:23PM +0100, Geert Hendrickx wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 06:50:04 -0500, Brian Foster wrote: > > > Maybe a simple compromise is a verbose option for xfs_admin itself..? > > > I.e., the normal use case operates as it does now, but the failure case > > > would print something like: > > > > > > "Feature conversion failed. Retry with -v for detailed error output." > > Ugh, no, by the time the sysadmin /reruns/ repair, the original output > is lost. Frankly I'd rather xfs_admin stop interfering with > stdout/stderr and teach repair to suppress errors due to upgrades. Yup, that's what the 'xfs_db -p <progname>' effectively does. It tells xfs_db to act as if it was some other program and behave differently.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
