On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 02:20:23PM +0100, Geert Hendrickx wrote: > On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 06:50:04 -0500, Brian Foster wrote: > > Maybe a simple compromise is a verbose option for xfs_admin itself..? > > I.e., the normal use case operates as it does now, but the failure case > > would print something like: > > > > "Feature conversion failed. Retry with -v for detailed error output." Ugh, no, by the time the sysadmin /reruns/ repair, the original output is lost. Frankly I'd rather xfs_admin stop interfering with stdout/stderr and teach repair to suppress errors due to upgrades. --D > > ... and then 'xfs_admin -v ...' would just pass through xfs_repair > > output. Eh? > > > Good suggestion, that should cover it. > > > Geert > >
