On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 06:50:04 -0500, Brian Foster wrote: > Maybe a simple compromise is a verbose option for xfs_admin itself..? > I.e., the normal use case operates as it does now, but the failure case > would print something like: > > "Feature conversion failed. Retry with -v for detailed error output." > > ... and then 'xfs_admin -v ...' would just pass through xfs_repair > output. Eh? Good suggestion, that should cover it. Geert
