Alexander Aring <alex.aring@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I tried to use BT 6LoWPAN and experienced a lot of races there, sadly
> nobody is fixing it. I sent a RFC some years ago to tackle these
> issues, also that the link-layer address is reconstructed by L3
> address and not by a ndisc lookup is very weird. I don't know if this
> is fixed or not. However it was nothing related to the new BT mesh
> stuff.
>> for any BT device. I would love to be wrong!!
>>
>> Running BTLE mesh is something I'd really like to do.
>> My guess is that one could probably prototype this in userspace on top of
>> bluez, and then use Alex' 6lowpan tap interface.
> I did not do the "6lowpan tap" interface, the bluetooth people did
> that and I complained about it and I never would accept this upstream.
okay, what did you use to connect the OpenThread native-build processes together?
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | IoT architect [
] mcr@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
