On 05/09/2012 07:41 PM, Seth Forshee wrote: > On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 12:23:43PM +0200, Arend van Spriel wrote: >> On 05/09/2012 11:41 AM, Jonathan Nieder wrote: >>> Hi Arend, >>> >>> Arend van Spriel wrote, about a month ago[1]: >>> >>>> I sent the patch to Camaleón to test it before sending out the >>>> patch. So the answer it definitely no. I wanted to get it into rc1, >>>> but we missed that. >>> >>> Any news? If there's a patch that goes in the right direction with >>> known problems I'd still be interested in it, among other reasons >>> because it would make the bug more concrete and make it easier to >>> think about possible fixes. >> >> Well, there is the short term fix, which is already upstream and moved >> to stable. The long term fix for which Seth Forshee (Canonical) did a >> great job is reviewed over here, but it involves regulatory related code >> so it needs discussions with our compliance team and supervisor. So that >> causes some lag time. > > The patches I sent still relies on the transmit-after-beacon fix, as I > preserved the behavior of muting tx if the channel is passive scan. I > *think* this isn't actually necessary, but I'd have to investigate a > little further to be certain. > > Seth > As part of the discussion over here I am proposing to get rid of the tx muting in brcmsmac as mac80211 already has that behaviour for passive channels if I am not mistaken (is this true, Johannes?). Gr. AvS -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
