On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 12:23:43PM +0200, Arend van Spriel wrote: > On 05/09/2012 11:41 AM, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > > Hi Arend, > > > > Arend van Spriel wrote, about a month ago[1]: > > > >> I sent the patch to Camaleón to test it before sending out the > >> patch. So the answer it definitely no. I wanted to get it into rc1, > >> but we missed that. > > > > Any news? If there's a patch that goes in the right direction with > > known problems I'd still be interested in it, among other reasons > > because it would make the bug more concrete and make it easier to > > think about possible fixes. > > Well, there is the short term fix, which is already upstream and moved > to stable. The long term fix for which Seth Forshee (Canonical) did a > great job is reviewed over here, but it involves regulatory related code > so it needs discussions with our compliance team and supervisor. So that > causes some lag time. The patches I sent still relies on the transmit-after-beacon fix, as I preserved the behavior of muting tx if the channel is passive scan. I *think* this isn't actually necessary, but I'd have to investigate a little further to be certain. Seth -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
