2011/11/30 Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 17:46 -0500, Nikolay Martynov wrote: > >> > Maybe the better approach would be to bump it up, but also only allow an >> > attempt once every say 15 seconds or so? It seems kinda useless to try 3 >> > (or 10/15) times in quick succession and then give up, vs. just trying >> > more spaced out? >> >> Makes sense to me. Although I would left first 2-3 go quickly in >> case first was lost due to random glitch there is no reason to wait 15 >> seconds. But if first 2-3 fail - it make sense split next apart, I >> think. > > Seems ok to me, want to implement it? :) Sure, I'll send patch for this. -- Truthfully yours, Martynov Nikolay. Email: mar.kolya@xxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
