2011/11/29 Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 17:28 -0500, Nikolay Martynov wrote: >> Hi. >> >> 2011/11/29 Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >> > On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 17:01 -0500, Nikolay Martynov wrote: >> > >> >> >> Do APs broken is such way exist? I.e. APs which declare aggregation >> >> >> support but do not respond to addba. >> >> > >> >> > I seem to remember something ... not really sure. >> >> >> >> If such APs exist I think it might be possible to extend my patch to >> >> do something like the following. For the first time make 10 attempts >> >> to establish addba. If this fails - make no more attempts for the >> >> duration of the connection. If this succeeds - use logic I've added in >> >> the patch. This should handle broken APs and won't allow agg to be >> >> disable because of some random blackout. >> > >> > Wouldn't that be equivalent to just bumping the number of tries? >> >> Well, sort of if you are willing to bump it to 10-15, I guess it >> would be kind of same thing. >> I've seen couple of times when 3 wasn't enough and agg got disabled, >> but 10-15 seems reasonably large to give up completely. > > Maybe the better approach would be to bump it up, but also only allow an > attempt once every say 15 seconds or so? It seems kinda useless to try 3 > (or 10/15) times in quick succession and then give up, vs. just trying > more spaced out? Makes sense to me. Although I would left first 2-3 go quickly in case first was lost due to random glitch there is no reason to wait 15 seconds. But if first 2-3 fail - it make sense split next apart, I think. -- Truthfully yours, Martynov Nikolay. Email: mar.kolya@xxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
