On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 17:46 -0500, Nikolay Martynov wrote: > > Maybe the better approach would be to bump it up, but also only allow an > > attempt once every say 15 seconds or so? It seems kinda useless to try 3 > > (or 10/15) times in quick succession and then give up, vs. just trying > > more spaced out? > > Makes sense to me. Although I would left first 2-3 go quickly in > case first was lost due to random glitch there is no reason to wait 15 > seconds. But if first 2-3 fail - it make sense split next apart, I > think. Seems ok to me, want to implement it? :) johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
