On 2011-09-20 12:13 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez
<mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Felix Fietkau<nbd@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 2011-09-19 11:54 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez
<mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Felix Fietkau<nbd@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I looked at the other ath driver and I see no indication that it's
related
to DFS in any way.
I have verified this just now as well, it seems it was only used to
support an ioctl to userspace to enable users to update a tpscale
value but I see no documentation about this. Next question is who in
usersapce sets this. I wonder if its done through userspace after
measuring some TPC reports from STAs.
So this comes from supporting a "TR-098" specification, which seems to
be the "Internet Gateway Device data model for the CPE WAN Management
Protocol". I haven't yet been able to map this to the specification
respective component:
http://www.broadband-forum.org/technical/download/TR-098.pdf
Interesting. That definitely supports my point that ath9k is the wrong place
for something like this to be. Let's just get rid of it.
Yeah, I'm now convinced :) die code. But please do add some blurb
about this tumor the code had.
In fact removing the tumor through a separate patch would be appreciated.
I don't think it needs a separate patch. It's dead code directly related
to the other things that I'm changing, and it does not add any
functional changes. I'll add a comment, though.
- Felix
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
