On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Felix Fietkau <nbd@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 2011-09-19 11:54 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> >> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez >> <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Felix Fietkau<nbd@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> I looked at the other ath driver and I see no indication that it's >>>> related >>>> to DFS in any way. >>> >>> I have verified this just now as well, it seems it was only used to >>> support an ioctl to userspace to enable users to update a tpscale >>> value but I see no documentation about this. Next question is who in >>> usersapce sets this. I wonder if its done through userspace after >>> measuring some TPC reports from STAs. >> >> So this comes from supporting a "TR-098" specification, which seems to >> be the "Internet Gateway Device data model for the CPE WAN Management >> Protocol". I haven't yet been able to map this to the specification >> respective component: >> >> http://www.broadband-forum.org/technical/download/TR-098.pdf > > Interesting. That definitely supports my point that ath9k is the wrong place > for something like this to be. Let's just get rid of it. Yeah, I'm now convinced :) die code. But please do add some blurb about this tumor the code had. Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
