On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Felix Fietkau <nbd@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 2011-09-19 11:54 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez >>> <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Felix Fietkau<nbd@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I looked at the other ath driver and I see no indication that it's >>>>> related >>>>> to DFS in any way. >>>> >>>> I have verified this just now as well, it seems it was only used to >>>> support an ioctl to userspace to enable users to update a tpscale >>>> value but I see no documentation about this. Next question is who in >>>> usersapce sets this. I wonder if its done through userspace after >>>> measuring some TPC reports from STAs. >>> >>> So this comes from supporting a "TR-098" specification, which seems to >>> be the "Internet Gateway Device data model for the CPE WAN Management >>> Protocol". I haven't yet been able to map this to the specification >>> respective component: >>> >>> http://www.broadband-forum.org/technical/download/TR-098.pdf >> >> Interesting. That definitely supports my point that ath9k is the wrong place >> for something like this to be. Let's just get rid of it. > > Yeah, I'm now convinced :) die code. But please do add some blurb > about this tumor the code had. In fact removing the tumor through a separate patch would be appreciated. Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
