On 08/24/2011 05:46 PM, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 05:39:48PM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> On 08/24/2011 05:25 PM, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote:
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ATH6KL_DEBUGFS
>>> +int ath6kl_init_debugfs(struct ath6kl *ar);
>>> +#else
>>> +static inline int ath6kl_init_debugfs(struct ath6kl *ar)
>>> +{
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +#endif
>>
>> I would prefer to call this ath6kl_debug_init(). That way we can put all
>> debug initialisation into that, not just debugfs code. And then the
>> ifdef should check for CONFIG_ATH6KL_DEBUG.
>
> May be, but I think we can't always enable debugfs based on only
> CONFIG_ATH6KL_DEBUG as the general debug does not depend on
> CONFIG_DEBUG_FS.
I don't see why we need to check for CONFIG_DEBUG_FS.
debugfs_create_file() should handle the case then CONFIG_DEBUG_FS is
disabled as it will just return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV).
Kalle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
