On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 1:09 AM, Florian Fainelli <florian@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 August 2011 10:07:44 Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> Hello Luis,
>>
>> On Tuesday 23 August 2011 02:08:39 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> > From: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > ---
>> >
>> > drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/pci.c | 1 +
>> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/pci.c
>> > b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/pci.c index daa26b5..6cb90ee 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/pci.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/pci.c
>> > @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ static DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE(ath_pci_id_table) = {
>> >
>> > { PCI_VDEVICE(ATHEROS, 0x002E) }, /* PCI-E */
>> > { PCI_VDEVICE(ATHEROS, 0x0030) }, /* PCI-E AR9300 */
>> > { PCI_VDEVICE(ATHEROS, 0x0032) }, /* PCI-E AR9485 */
>> >
>> > + { PCI_VDEVICE(ATHEROS, 0x0033) }, /* PCI-E AR9580 */
>> >
>> > { 0 }
>> >
>> > };
>>
>> You also need this change in hw.{c,h} for ath9k not to bail out with "ath:
>> Hardware device ID 0x0033 not supported":
>>
>> Index: compat-wireless-2011-08-10/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- compat-wireless-2011-08-10.orig/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.c
>> 2011-08-23 10:01:30.804054398 +0200
>> +++ compat-wireless-2011-08-10/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.c
>> 2011-08-23 10:01:46.314054408 +0200
>> @@ -672,6 +672,7 @@
>> case AR9300_DEVID_AR9485_PCIE:
>> case AR9300_DEVID_AR9330:
>> case AR9300_DEVID_AR9340:
>> + case AR9300_DEVID_AR9580:
>> break;
>> default:
>> if (common->bus_ops->ath_bus_type == ATH_USB)
>> Index: compat-wireless-2011-08-10/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.h
>> ===================================================================
>> --- compat-wireless-2011-08-10.orig/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.h
>> 2011-08-23 10:01:32.504054400 +0200
>> +++ compat-wireless-2011-08-10/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.h
>> 2011-08-23 10:01:59.124054416 +0200
>> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
>> #define AR9300_DEVID_PCIE 0x0030
>> #define AR9300_DEVID_AR9340 0x0031
>> #define AR9300_DEVID_AR9485_PCIE 0x0032
>> +#define AR9300_DEVID_AR9580 0x0033
>> #define AR9300_DEVID_AR9330 0x0035
>>
>> #define AR5416_AR9100_DEVID 0x000b
>>
>> With the above two patches applied, I get the following:
>>
>> iw dev wlan0 scan
>> command failed: Device or resource busy (-16)
>
> I had wpa_supplicant running in background, scan does no longer report Device
> or resource busy now.
You do get scan results now?
>> iw phy0 info shows the 5GHz band has being listed
>>
>> iw dev wlan0 survey dump seems to correctly list the activity on the 5Ghz
>> channels (it's updated from one call to another)
>>
>> if I start the interface in AP mode, my laptop does not see it's beacon, I
>> have not had a chance yet to use a monitor interface.
>
> I will test later the opposite, where my laptop is in AP mode, and try to get
> this AR9580 device in STA mode.
OK thanks.
Luis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
