On Tuesday 23 August 2011 15:16:32 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 1:09 AM, Florian Fainelli <florian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> > On Tuesday 23 August 2011 10:07:44 Florian Fainelli wrote:
> >> Hello Luis,
> >>
> >> On Tuesday 23 August 2011 02:08:39 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >> > From: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> > ---
> >> >
> >> > drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/pci.c | 1 +
> >> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/pci.c
> >> > b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/pci.c index daa26b5..6cb90ee 100644
> >> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/pci.c
> >> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/pci.c
> >> > @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ static DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE(ath_pci_id_table) = {
> >> >
> >> > { PCI_VDEVICE(ATHEROS, 0x002E) }, /* PCI-E */
> >> > { PCI_VDEVICE(ATHEROS, 0x0030) }, /* PCI-E AR9300 */
> >> > { PCI_VDEVICE(ATHEROS, 0x0032) }, /* PCI-E AR9485 */
> >> >
> >> > + { PCI_VDEVICE(ATHEROS, 0x0033) }, /* PCI-E AR9580 */
> >> >
> >> > { 0 }
> >> >
> >> > };
> >>
> >> You also need this change in hw.{c,h} for ath9k not to bail out with
> >> "ath: Hardware device ID 0x0033 not supported":
> >>
> >> Index: compat-wireless-2011-08-10/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.c
> >> ===================================================================
> >> --- compat-wireless-2011-08-10.orig/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.c
> >> 2011-08-23 10:01:30.804054398 +0200
> >> +++ compat-wireless-2011-08-10/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.c
> >> 2011-08-23 10:01:46.314054408 +0200
> >> @@ -672,6 +672,7 @@
> >> case AR9300_DEVID_AR9485_PCIE:
> >> case AR9300_DEVID_AR9330:
> >> case AR9300_DEVID_AR9340:
> >> + case AR9300_DEVID_AR9580:
> >> break;
> >> default:
> >> if (common->bus_ops->ath_bus_type == ATH_USB)
> >> Index: compat-wireless-2011-08-10/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.h
> >> ===================================================================
> >> --- compat-wireless-2011-08-10.orig/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.h
> >> 2011-08-23 10:01:32.504054400 +0200
> >> +++ compat-wireless-2011-08-10/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.h
> >> 2011-08-23 10:01:59.124054416 +0200
> >> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
> >> #define AR9300_DEVID_PCIE 0x0030
> >> #define AR9300_DEVID_AR9340 0x0031
> >> #define AR9300_DEVID_AR9485_PCIE 0x0032
> >> +#define AR9300_DEVID_AR9580 0x0033
> >> #define AR9300_DEVID_AR9330 0x0035
> >>
> >> #define AR5416_AR9100_DEVID 0x000b
> >>
> >> With the above two patches applied, I get the following:
> >>
> >> iw dev wlan0 scan
> >> command failed: Device or resource busy (-16)
> >
> > I had wpa_supplicant running in background, scan does no longer report
> > Device or resource busy now.
>
> You do get scan results now?
Yes I do, I was confused with the regulatory domain configured, plus there is
not that many 5Ghz activity around me.
>
> >> iw phy0 info shows the 5GHz band has being listed
> >>
> >> iw dev wlan0 survey dump seems to correctly list the activity on the
> >> 5Ghz channels (it's updated from one call to another)
> >>
> >> if I start the interface in AP mode, my laptop does not see it's beacon,
> >> I have not had a chance yet to use a monitor interface.
> >
> > I will test later the opposite, where my laptop is in AP mode, and try to
> > get this AR9580 device in STA mode.
>
> OK thanks.
This is working fine in both modes: AP and STA, and I get pretty decent rates
(~56,2 Mbits/sec unencrypted) in both directions and roles.
Feel free to add my Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian@xxxxxxxxxxx> to the
final patchset.
Thank you very much for your support on this!
--
Florian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
