On Tuesday 23 August 2011 10:07:44 Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Hello Luis,
>
> On Tuesday 23 August 2011 02:08:39 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > From: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >
> > drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/pci.c | 1 +
> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/pci.c
> > b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/pci.c index daa26b5..6cb90ee 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/pci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/pci.c
> > @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ static DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE(ath_pci_id_table) = {
> >
> > { PCI_VDEVICE(ATHEROS, 0x002E) }, /* PCI-E */
> > { PCI_VDEVICE(ATHEROS, 0x0030) }, /* PCI-E AR9300 */
> > { PCI_VDEVICE(ATHEROS, 0x0032) }, /* PCI-E AR9485 */
> >
> > + { PCI_VDEVICE(ATHEROS, 0x0033) }, /* PCI-E AR9580 */
> >
> > { 0 }
> >
> > };
>
> You also need this change in hw.{c,h} for ath9k not to bail out with "ath:
> Hardware device ID 0x0033 not supported":
>
> Index: compat-wireless-2011-08-10/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.c
> ===================================================================
> --- compat-wireless-2011-08-10.orig/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.c
> 2011-08-23 10:01:30.804054398 +0200
> +++ compat-wireless-2011-08-10/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.c
> 2011-08-23 10:01:46.314054408 +0200
> @@ -672,6 +672,7 @@
> case AR9300_DEVID_AR9485_PCIE:
> case AR9300_DEVID_AR9330:
> case AR9300_DEVID_AR9340:
> + case AR9300_DEVID_AR9580:
> break;
> default:
> if (common->bus_ops->ath_bus_type == ATH_USB)
> Index: compat-wireless-2011-08-10/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.h
> ===================================================================
> --- compat-wireless-2011-08-10.orig/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.h
> 2011-08-23 10:01:32.504054400 +0200
> +++ compat-wireless-2011-08-10/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.h
> 2011-08-23 10:01:59.124054416 +0200
> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
> #define AR9300_DEVID_PCIE 0x0030
> #define AR9300_DEVID_AR9340 0x0031
> #define AR9300_DEVID_AR9485_PCIE 0x0032
> +#define AR9300_DEVID_AR9580 0x0033
> #define AR9300_DEVID_AR9330 0x0035
>
> #define AR5416_AR9100_DEVID 0x000b
>
> With the above two patches applied, I get the following:
>
> iw dev wlan0 scan
> command failed: Device or resource busy (-16)
I had wpa_supplicant running in background, scan does no longer report Device
or resource busy now.
>
> iw phy0 info shows the 5GHz band has being listed
>
> iw dev wlan0 survey dump seems to correctly list the activity on the 5Ghz
> channels (it's updated from one call to another)
>
> if I start the interface in AP mode, my laptop does not see it's beacon, I
> have not had a chance yet to use a monitor interface.
I will test later the opposite, where my laptop is in AP mode, and try to get
this AR9580 device in STA mode.
>
> Let me know if you want me to give you more debug.
>
> Thank you very much!
--
Florian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
