Hello Luis,
On Tuesday 23 August 2011 02:08:39 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> From: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/pci.c | 1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/pci.c
> b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/pci.c index daa26b5..6cb90ee 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/pci.c
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ static DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE(ath_pci_id_table) = {
> { PCI_VDEVICE(ATHEROS, 0x002E) }, /* PCI-E */
> { PCI_VDEVICE(ATHEROS, 0x0030) }, /* PCI-E AR9300 */
> { PCI_VDEVICE(ATHEROS, 0x0032) }, /* PCI-E AR9485 */
> + { PCI_VDEVICE(ATHEROS, 0x0033) }, /* PCI-E AR9580 */
> { 0 }
> };
You also need this change in hw.{c,h} for ath9k not to bail out with "ath:
Hardware device ID 0x0033 not supported":
Index: compat-wireless-2011-08-10/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.c
===================================================================
--- compat-wireless-2011-08-10.orig/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.c
2011-08-23 10:01:30.804054398 +0200
+++ compat-wireless-2011-08-10/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.c
2011-08-23 10:01:46.314054408 +0200
@@ -672,6 +672,7 @@
case AR9300_DEVID_AR9485_PCIE:
case AR9300_DEVID_AR9330:
case AR9300_DEVID_AR9340:
+ case AR9300_DEVID_AR9580:
break;
default:
if (common->bus_ops->ath_bus_type == ATH_USB)
Index: compat-wireless-2011-08-10/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.h
===================================================================
--- compat-wireless-2011-08-10.orig/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.h
2011-08-23 10:01:32.504054400 +0200
+++ compat-wireless-2011-08-10/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.h
2011-08-23 10:01:59.124054416 +0200
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
#define AR9300_DEVID_PCIE 0x0030
#define AR9300_DEVID_AR9340 0x0031
#define AR9300_DEVID_AR9485_PCIE 0x0032
+#define AR9300_DEVID_AR9580 0x0033
#define AR9300_DEVID_AR9330 0x0035
#define AR5416_AR9100_DEVID 0x000b
With the above two patches applied, I get the following:
iw dev wlan0 scan
command failed: Device or resource busy (-16)
iw phy0 info shows the 5GHz band has being listed
iw dev wlan0 survey dump seems to correctly list the activity on the 5Ghz
channels (it's updated from one call to another)
if I start the interface in AP mode, my laptop does not see it's beacon, I
have not had a chance yet to use a monitor interface.
Let me know if you want me to give you more debug.
Thank you very much!
--
Florian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
