On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Am Dienstag 26 Oktober 2010 schrieb Johannes Berg: >> On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 11:35 +0200, Helmut Schaa wrote: >> >> > > I'll let Ivo decide on this. At least if we really want to wait more then one >> > > second for DMA to be ready we should increase the msleep(1) to msleep(10) and >> > > keep the maximum number of retries at 100. >> >> > Ivo, do we want to add the excessive waiting (up to one second) for DMA on >> > rt2800 as it fixes Joshuas device? At the moment we're waiting 100ms. >> >> I don't usually chime in on other drivers but is there any reason not >> to? Properly functioning devices obviously reply within 100ms, so they >> wouldn't change behaviour, hopefully broken ones that _never_ work are >> rare, and the remaining ones like Joshua's would be fixed ... > > True, nevertheless I wanted to get Ivos ack before going ahead. yeah, I don't mind waiting for a full second, on my machine a normal ifconfig up takes already ages for some odd reason, so another second wouldn't matter if that means that more devices can function. :) Ivo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
