Am Dienstag 26 Oktober 2010 schrieb Johannes Berg: > On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 11:35 +0200, Helmut Schaa wrote: > > > > I'll let Ivo decide on this. At least if we really want to wait more then one > > > second for DMA to be ready we should increase the msleep(1) to msleep(10) and > > > keep the maximum number of retries at 100. > > > Ivo, do we want to add the excessive waiting (up to one second) for DMA on > > rt2800 as it fixes Joshuas device? At the moment we're waiting 100ms. > > I don't usually chime in on other drivers but is there any reason not > to? Properly functioning devices obviously reply within 100ms, so they > wouldn't change behaviour, hopefully broken ones that _never_ work are > rare, and the remaining ones like Joshua's would be fixed ... True, nevertheless I wanted to get Ivos ack before going ahead. Helmut -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
