On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 11:35 +0200, Helmut Schaa wrote: > > I'll let Ivo decide on this. At least if we really want to wait more then one > > second for DMA to be ready we should increase the msleep(1) to msleep(10) and > > keep the maximum number of retries at 100. > Ivo, do we want to add the excessive waiting (up to one second) for DMA on > rt2800 as it fixes Joshuas device? At the moment we're waiting 100ms. I don't usually chime in on other drivers but is there any reason not to? Properly functioning devices obviously reply within 100ms, so they wouldn't change behaviour, hopefully broken ones that _never_ work are rare, and the remaining ones like Joshua's would be fixed ... johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
