On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 02:04:03PM -0500, Larry Finger wrote: > On 04/26/2010 01:33 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > > 2010/4/26 John W. Linville <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > >> FWIW, this patch series also still results in a hang on my problematic > >> netbook. I'm going to merge them anyway, in hopes that they make > >> things better for someone (or at least get us closer to it). I'll try > >> to pinpoint this hang as well. > > > > Did it actually pick another (newly discovered) offset for SPROM > > location in your case? Could you add some single printk to check this? > > My suggestion is that for now we only implement John's patch for no > SPROM. I am hoping that we try to fix the failures for boxes with the > SPROM in a normal location. Once we do that, there will be a simpler fix > for testing at the alternate location. The patch will all be contained > in sprom_do_read(). Hmmm...well, I just pushed (just to my public trees, not to Dave) Rafał's trio of patches on top of mine. Should I revert them? John P.S. With those patches, this box (soon to be Larry's) still uses an sprom_offset value of 0x1000. -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx might be all we have. Be ready. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
