On 04/16/2010 10:51 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > W dniu 16 kwietnia 2010 15:37 użytkownik John W. Linville > <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> napisał: >> On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 08:20:51AM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote: >>> John, I posted some time ago following patches: >>> >>> [RFT][PATCH] ssb: Look for SPROM at different offset on higher rev CC >>> [PATCH 1/2] ssb: Use relative offsets for SPROM >>> [PATCH 2/2] ssb: Fix order of definitions and some text space indents >>> >>> while Michael has some doubts about "ssb: Look for SPROM at different >>> offset on higher rev CC" I explained to him that what he does not like >>> was fixed in next 2 posted patches. >>> >>> AFAIR you got some device with this recently-discovered location of >>> SPROM. Could you test my set if it makes your card working? If so, >>> could you take that patches to your tree? >> >> Sorry, been busy w/ other things. FWIW, my implementation based on >> the RE work from Larry did not work on the box in question, and my >> implementation wasn't substantially different from yours. Anyway, >> I'll try to confirm this soon w/ your patches and to collect more >> information for Larry. > > Ah, I didn't know you got own implementation. Had to miss it. > > Larry do you have any ideas what else may we do incorrectly? No. AFAICT, we have implemented it correctly. Any additional info would be welcome. Larry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
