W dniu 16 kwietnia 2010 15:37 użytkownik John W. Linville <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> napisał: > On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 08:20:51AM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote: >> John, I posted some time ago following patches: >> >> [RFT][PATCH] ssb: Look for SPROM at different offset on higher rev CC >> [PATCH 1/2] ssb: Use relative offsets for SPROM >> [PATCH 2/2] ssb: Fix order of definitions and some text space indents >> >> while Michael has some doubts about "ssb: Look for SPROM at different >> offset on higher rev CC" I explained to him that what he does not like >> was fixed in next 2 posted patches. >> >> AFAIR you got some device with this recently-discovered location of >> SPROM. Could you test my set if it makes your card working? If so, >> could you take that patches to your tree? > > Sorry, been busy w/ other things. FWIW, my implementation based on > the RE work from Larry did not work on the box in question, and my > implementation wasn't substantially different from yours. Anyway, > I'll try to confirm this soon w/ your patches and to collect more > information for Larry. Ah, I didn't know you got own implementation. Had to miss it. Larry do you have any ideas what else may we do incorrectly? John: may be worth checking if your card matched this new condition and if driver actually used "new" offset. -- Rafał -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
