On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 18:01 +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote: > On 2010-01-30 5:26 PM, Johannes Berg wrote: > > On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 10:22 -0600, Greg Oliver wrote: > > > >> > I don't think I can parse that. In any case, a possible use case would > >> > for instance be a protected company network, along with an unprotected, > >> > internet-only guest network. > >> > >> > >> Hmmm, I would put the odds at that happening about 100,000:1 (if not more) > >> > >> Yes, I know it is feasible, but HIGHLY unlikely. > > > > It's not. openwrt for example has that as a default configuration. Even > > fonera does. > OpenWrt doesn't even bring up wifi in the default config. It has a one > configured AP mode interface per PHY, which is disabled by default ;) Oh, whatever, but it's a pretty standard setup for it anyway. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
