On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 10:14 -0600, Greg Oliver wrote: > On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Johannes Berg > <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I suggest you go public with your reply so you can be flamed and taught > > wrong appropriately. > > Sorry - this gmail inefficiency sometimes gets me... > > BUT, please enlighten me when any of the 3 use cases would be > beneficial to anyone not trying to (or "inefficiently migrating") hack > into a network would occur. I don't think I can parse that. In any case, a possible use case would for instance be a protected company network, along with an unprotected, internet-only guest network. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part