On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I suggest you go public with your reply so you can be flamed and taught > wrong appropriately. Sorry - this gmail inefficiency sometimes gets me... BUT, please enlighten me when any of the 3 use cases would be beneficial to anyone not trying to (or "inefficiently migrating") hack into a network would occur. -Greg > On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 09:51 -0600, Greg Oliver wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Johannes Berg >> <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 12:27 -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote: >> >> What are the restrictions (on ath9k) for multiple SSID with hostap >> >> on same physical device. Should/will the following work: >> >> >> >> 1. Duplicate SSID's (different channels) >> > >> > Not really/well, wouldn't go there right now. >> > >> >> 2. Same channel but different SSID >> > >> > Yes. >> > >> >> 3. Duplicate SSID, same channel, but different encryption method >> > >> > "Duplicate SSID"? If you mean the same SSID and different encryption, I >> > don't think that's supported. If you just meant two SSIDs with different >> > encryption, that's doable by using two (B)SSIDs. >> > >> >> There's no really honest use case for any of the examples presented. >> "They" must want a head start on the next hackers conference.. >> > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
