On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez<mcgrof@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Marcel Holtmann<marcel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi Luis, >> >>> > OK not so bad except for: >>> > >>> > > kernel/net/wimax/wimax.ko >>> > >>> > That's touching another subsystem but we could technically merge wimax >>> > into compat-wireless if Inaky thinks that's a good idea. the point >>> > here is to unify anything that uses rfkill for backport usage. >>> >>> Oh boy, can of worms >>> >>> I have my own compat-wimax already, which already handles things for >>> backwards compat (many #ifdef hacks to simplify life) and which is >>> heavily used internally. >>> >>> I don't really know how much worth it might be and I know I don't have >>> resources to support both. >> >> for the wireless-compat tree, I would just remove the RFKILL support for >> WiMAX. It is really not worth to support it. > > Works for me, we then still need to address (if we really care) the > platform stuff. If someone is interested feel free to send patches to > add those, I figure as long we get down to the latest supported stable > kernel it should be good. The latest supported stable kernel is always > on display on kernel,org, today being 2.6.27. BTW inaky -- this is actually up to you, are you wiling to live with no rfkill for compat? Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
