On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Johannes Berg<johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 16:45 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > >> Johannes, did kernels < 2.6.31 have /sys/class/rfkill ? > > Yes, but I never understood why that matters. If you've got > compat-wireless "rfkill" loaded then the original rfkill can't be loaded > anyway. And their symbols would probably clash anyway if the original is > built in, in which case you can't use compat. > > You haven't renamed cfg80211's sysfs either, so why rfkill? > > johannes > There are a couple of wimax drivers which depends on rfkill... or bluetooth drivers? I think one likely reason is that there are valid situations or hardware combinations which requires having both of them loaded. (but that's a whole can of worms ) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html