On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 12:36 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > > On a related note, Johannes, would you be opposed to exporting something I > > > could call from thinkpad-acpi to request a radio state change on a rfkill > > > struct? This would allow me to remove some of the mess in thinkpad-acpi. > > > > I don't think I understand what you want? What do you mean by "request a > > radio state change"? > > As in "please try to block this _specific_ radio", and "please try to > unblock this _specific_ radio". > > I.e. what one would do by a write to the "state" attribute of the _old_ > rfkill sysfs (and which would get overriden the next time someone changed > the global state, etc). Ok, but where would you want that exported to? It's available on /dev/rfkill, why would you want that for the driver, it can just call itself, no? johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
