On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 10:33 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > I don't know if I have any gripes with your latest patch ;) Can't test it > right now. I was reacting to the comments in the thread. Well could you read it and see if the API does what you require? A discussion about that would be so much more useful than handwaving about LED blinking and security issues... > On a related note, Johannes, would you be opposed to exporting something I > could call from thinkpad-acpi to request a radio state change on a rfkill > struct? This would allow me to remove some of the mess in thinkpad-acpi. I don't think I understand what you want? What do you mean by "request a radio state change"? johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
