On Sun, 2009-05-31 at 10:13 +0100, Alan Jenkins wrote: > If I read correctly, userspace can write to the global states, but > can't read them? I think it's awkward to implement rfkill-input in > userspace without being able to read the global states. The daemon > would have to save the states in a file, in case it is restarted. You have a point there, but I'm not sure it even cares? When restarted it will probably want to impose its current policy anyway? It would be easy to add that we send the global default value for newly added ones too but I'm not sure it's necessary -- Marcel? johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part