On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 02:15:41AM +0000, David Lin wrote:
> > From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Friday, June 14, 2024 2:32 PM
> > To: David Lin <yu-hao.lin@xxxxxxx>
> > Cc: linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > briannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxx; kvalo@xxxxxxxxxx; francesco@xxxxxxxxxx; Pete
> > Hsieh <tsung-hsien.hsieh@xxxxxxx>; Francesco Dolcini
> > <francesco.dolcini@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v10 2/2] wifi: mwifiex: add host mlme for AP
> > mode
> >
> > Caution: This is an external email. Please take care when clicking links or
> > opening attachments. When in doubt, report the message using the 'Report
> > this email' button
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 02:06:45AM +0000, David Lin wrote:
> > > > From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2024 9:12 PM
> > > > To: David Lin <yu-hao.lin@xxxxxxx>
> > > > Cc: linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > > > briannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxx; kvalo@xxxxxxxxxx; francesco@xxxxxxxxxx;
> > > > Pete Hsieh <tsung-hsien.hsieh@xxxxxxx>; Francesco Dolcini
> > > > <francesco.dolcini@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v10 2/2] wifi: mwifiex: add host mlme for
> > > > AP mode
> > > >
> > > > Caution: This is an external email. Please take care when clicking
> > > > links or opening attachments. When in doubt, report the message
> > > > using the 'Report this email' button
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi David,
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 02:06:26PM +0800, David Lin wrote:
> > > > > Add host based MLME to enable WPA3 functionalities in AP mode.
> > > > > This feature required a firmware with the corresponding V2 Key API
> > > > > support. The feature (WPA3) is currently enabled and verified only
> > > > > on IW416. Also, verified no regression with change when host MLME
> > > > > is disabled.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: David Lin <yu-hao.lin@xxxxxxx>
> > > > > Reviewed-by: Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/uap_cmd.c
> > > > > b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/uap_cmd.c
> > > > > index 491e36611909..073c665183b3 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/uap_cmd.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/uap_cmd.c
> > > > > @@ -72,6 +72,10 @@ int mwifiex_set_secure_params(struct
> > > > mwifiex_private *priv,
> > > > > bss_config->key_mgmt =
> > > > KEY_MGMT_PSK;
> > > > > }
> > > > > break;
> > > > > + case WLAN_AKM_SUITE_SAE:
> > > > > + bss_config->protocol = PROTOCOL_WPA2;
> > > > > + bss_config->key_mgmt = KEY_MGMT_SAE;
> > > > > + break;
> > > >
> > > > Shouldn't this be |= PROTOCOL_WPA2 and |= KEY_MGMT_SAE?
> > > > Clearing the other flags when SAE is enabled looks wrong to me.
> > > >
> > > > Sascha
> > > >
> > >
> > > These fields are used for the configuration of FW, this is the correct setting.
> >
> > This is done in a loop iterating over the different AKM suites, with your patch
> > this looks like this:
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < params->crypto.n_akm_suites; i++) {
> > switch (params->crypto.akm_suites[i]) {
> > case WLAN_AKM_SUITE_8021X:
> > if (params->crypto.wpa_versions &
> > NL80211_WPA_VERSION_1) {
> > bss_config->protocol =
> > PROTOCOL_WPA;
> > bss_config->key_mgmt =
> > KEY_MGMT_EAP;
> > }
> > if (params->crypto.wpa_versions &
> > NL80211_WPA_VERSION_2) {
> > bss_config->protocol |=
> > PROTOCOL_WPA2;
> > bss_config->key_mgmt =
> > KEY_MGMT_EAP;
> > }
> > break;
> > case WLAN_AKM_SUITE_PSK:
> > if (params->crypto.wpa_versions &
> > NL80211_WPA_VERSION_1) {
> > bss_config->protocol =
> > PROTOCOL_WPA;
> > bss_config->key_mgmt =
> > KEY_MGMT_PSK;
> > }
> > if (params->crypto.wpa_versions &
> > NL80211_WPA_VERSION_2) {
> > bss_config->protocol |=
> > PROTOCOL_WPA2;
> > bss_config->key_mgmt =
> > KEY_MGMT_PSK;
> > }
> > break;
> > case WLAN_AKM_SUITE_SAE:
> > bss_config->protocol = PROTOCOL_WPA2;
> > bss_config->key_mgmt = KEY_MGMT_SAE;
> > break;
> >
> > default:
> > break;
> > }
> > }
> >
> > It looks wrong to overwrite bss_config->protocol and bss_config->key_mgmt in
> > each iteration of this loop. If that would be correct, you wouldn't need a loop
> > at all, but could instead configure based on the last AKM suite entry.
> >
> > In my understanding the bits in bss_config->key_mgmt should be ored together
> > depending on the possible AKM suites which is also what the downstream
> > driver does.
> >
>
> For the configuration of FW, ored only happens for the same AKM suite.
Sorry, I don't understand this. Could you elaborate what you mean here?
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
