On 9/25/23 18:51, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Mon, 2023-09-25 at 18:49 +0530, Aditya Kumar Singh wrote:
Perhaps we should just get rid of sdata_dereference() entirely, after
all, it's the same now, just the arguments are switched for no good
reason.
Yup agreed. Are you already aware of any WIP in this regards? If not, I
can take care for the CSA part at least in same series (in a different
patch obviously :) )
No, I was just thinking out loud now :)
Sure.
It'd be a trivial spatch, but I guess it'd be nicer to not have all that
"sdata->local->hw.wiphy" in there if there's already another local or
even wiphy variable in the function. And then while that's probably
still possible in spatch, it's no longer trivial ;-)
Haha! Okay, let me see what I can do.
