On Mon, 2023-09-25 at 18:49 +0530, Aditya Kumar Singh wrote: > > > > Perhaps we should just get rid of sdata_dereference() entirely, after > > all, it's the same now, just the arguments are switched for no good > > reason. > Yup agreed. Are you already aware of any WIP in this regards? If not, I > can take care for the CSA part at least in same series (in a different > patch obviously :) ) No, I was just thinking out loud now :) It'd be a trivial spatch, but I guess it'd be nicer to not have all that "sdata->local->hw.wiphy" in there if there's already another local or even wiphy variable in the function. And then while that's probably still possible in spatch, it's no longer trivial ;-) johannes
